Выражение встречается в следующем контексте:
Документ о сравнении закона о компаниях (Великобритании) 2006 года с законами других лет, плюсы-минусы, обзор Закона, положения о регистрации компаний

Привожу большой текст только для контекста. Помогите, пожалуйста, перевести конкретно предложение Why a constitution, still less one filed for all the world to see, filed together with a score of similar documents that are nobody else’s business?

A number of pointed questions should be raised. Why not acknowledge the fact that so much of the baggage of our traditional company law is irrelevant to the running of small businesses and is in fact ignored in practice?; Why is it still not possible for a newly formed company to adopt a pre-incorporation contract? ; Why require to compile a directors' report? Why meeting and voting? Partnership law manages without, and in practice so do most small companies, whatever the law says; Why a constitution, still less one filed for all the world to see, filed together with a score of similar documents that are nobody else's business?; Why have a section - ''the old s.14'' - deeming a company's members to be in a contractual relationships with the company and each other when this contract has been virtually stripped of meaning?; Why not a new charge registration system? ; Why require every company to keep at its registered office a copy of every instrument creating a charge, not only those charges registrable at Companies House?

Еще о "constitution" говорится в следующем абзаце:
The third consultation document Company Formation and Capital Maintenance contained radical proposals for the restructuring of the constitution of the company, and relaxations of the capital maintenance doctrine.

Заранее большое спасибо

He uses 'still less' because he's arguing that 'there's no need for a constitution, and there's even less of a need for a constitution, a (copy/print) of which must be filed for all the world to see'.