 |
|
Subject: и правильно признаны необоснованными law Доводы, изложенные в жалобе о том, что..., являлись предметом проверки районным судом и правильно признаны необоснованными...... Я сначала набираю гипотетическую фразу на англ. в гугле. Если ничего подобного нет, значит, в принципе, так не говорят: Arguments in the complaint that...were verified by the district court [and were correctly found inconsistent]... The district court verified the arguments...and reasonably found them inconsistent.... ? |
|
link 30.05.2018 20:01 |
|
'The arguments (set forth1/put forward2) in the complaint ...... were examined by the district court and were correctly found to be without foundation'. 1 = officialese/legalese 2 = standard English |
|
link 30.05.2018 20:32 |
| 'correctly' or 'duly' |
| Thank you. Don't you like 'inconsistent'? I heard this from an English native speaker long ago... |
|
Как вариант: the court has reviewed the plaintiff's/complainant's case/arguments... and validly/rightly found that the (plaintiff) did not have an arguable case / that the complaint does not amount to an arguable case |
|
link 31.05.2018 12:46 |
|
Alex16: It depends on what exactly необоснованными means here. If, as I assume, it just means that it doesn't have an основа, then I'd normally use 'groundless/baseless/unfounded' etc. But in ref to legal arguments for or against sth, I'd probably use 'without merit/without foundation' etc. So an appeal can be rejected by an appeal court because the judges feel that the appeal (or the arguments used in it) is/are 'without merit'. 'without merit' is often used by the courts when they reject sth, and 'without foundation' is used more generally when rejecting arguments/claims – say, in the courts or in debates generally. 'without merit': 'Inconsistent' usually means 'varying/changing/irregular' etc. Usually if sth's inconsistent, it's understood to be 'inconsistent with sth'. If it's 'inconsistent with the law', it's not in line with the law, ie illegal. I don't know the context for your previous example and I'm not a legal expert, but 'inconsistent' doesn't seem as suitable in this case. |
|
link 31.05.2018 12:48 |
| PS: I don't know why two of those URLs didn't become hyperlinks. If anyone knows, please let me know! |
| Thank you, it's clear now. I will change 'inconstistent'. |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |