 |
|
link 14.04.2009 6:59 |
|
Subject: law law There may be only one exception in all of constitutional law. And not only does current doctrine adhere to the Application Understandings; it has made them central, building on them, organizing interpretation around them – treating them, in short, as paradigm cases.помогите перевести пожалуйста что такое Application Understandings и No Application Understandings |
|
link 14.04.2009 7:22 |
| недостаточно информации, чтобы точно сказать перевод. Где впервые говорится в тексте об " Application Understanding " ?? |
|
link 14.04.2009 7:32 |
|
A “No-Application Understanding” (as I use the term) of a prohibitory commitment (запрет) is any understanding of the form, “The commitment does not apply to (does not prohibit) x.” As in: “The First Amendment does not prohibit the sale of flour in ten-pound bags.” By contrast, an Application Understanding is an understanding of the form, “The commitment does apply to (does prohibit) x.” As in: “The First Amendment prohibits prior restraints.” [The first three chapters of this book show that, strangely enough, constitutional law has for two centuries drawn a distinction between historical understandings along these lines. Constitutional doctrine, from the outset to the present day, has systematically stuck to historical Application Understandings, even while very frequently overturning historical No-Application Understandings. |
| оговорка о применении - оговорка о неприменении |
| Diana_1984, что это у вас? Вы перевод делаете или просто понять хотите? Если перевод, то для чего и для кого? |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |