Subject: even a company that doesn’t have a meritorious claim law The _____ example suggests that even a company that doesn’t have a meritorious claim can, if sufficiently determined, harass the Government by attaching assets abroad. While these attachments, if improper (because, for example, the property in question is used for a governmental purpose) can ultimately be overturned, the resulting publicity will keep the XXX affair in the public’s eye.Я понимаю, что это от слова "merits", но как перевести? |
http://dictionary.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/results.pl?co=dictionary.lp.findlaw.com&topic=90/9064c5658d143aa2a51bc0f303bca684 обоснованное требование, имхо |
Вот как! |
You need to be logged in to post in the forum |