 |
|
Subject: судебный приказ о временном запрещении law судебный приказ о временном запрещении, принятый американским судом, рне является решением по существу делаThe interim injunction issued by the US court is not a decision on the merits...? |
|
link 27.05.2007 6:58 |
| а где контекст? запрещение чего? |
|
link 27.05.2007 7:22 |
| ну что Вы молчите? decision on the merits of the case. для приказа о временном запрещении нужен контекст. |
|
link 27.05.2007 7:35 |
|
такой контекст? injunction, in law, order of a court directing a party to perform a certain act or to refrain from an act or acts. The injunction, which developed as the main remedy in equity, is used especially where money damages would not satisfy a plaintiff's claim, or to protect personal or property rights from irreparable harm. It has been historically important especially in tort, domestic relations, labor, and civil-rights law. Interim Injunctions These are injunctions until a specified date or event. Typical circumstances where such an order might be sought are where an alleged infringer threatens to dispose of his stock of offending items and disappear before a case against him can come to trial. The purpose of such injunctions is to prevent a party from taking steps that could defeat the process of justice |
|
No need for broader context: A U.S. court interim injunction does not decide the case. No need for “merits”--it's within the decision. Or it’s “a freeze [order].” Quite legal, too. |
|
Я только что пришел. Там не сказано, о запрещении чего. Там далее сказано "запрещающее решение" - некорректный обратный перевод. Скороее всего, это injunction. |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |