Subject: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT OBLIVIOUS of the obvious...... Коллеги, прошу помочь перевести фразу, указанную в теме... Контекст ниже...The effort to make these things available to history, or to researchers, or to those who just want to explore is now inhibited by a set of rules that were written for a radically different context. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT OBLIVIOUS of the obvious. Or, at least, it does not need to be. In my view, a pragmatic court committed to interpreting and applying our framers' Constitution would see that if Congress has the power to perpetually extend existing terms, then the constitutional requirement that terms be limited has lost its force. |
ИМХО Конституционное право должно включать в себя и (совершенно) очевидные вещи. |
А если пойти от обратного, имхо: Конституционное право строится на принципах оценки объективной реальности. По крайней мере, в этом есть необходимость |
You need to be logged in to post in the forum |