Не могу понять, каким образом построена фраза в гонконгском уставе. Если which do not относится к arrangement, то почему множественное число, а если к benefits, то получается benefits... which do not provide special benefits. Не могу разобраться со смыслом.

Контекст:

(3) The director must neither —

(a) vote in respect of the transaction, arrangement or contract in which the director is so interested; nor (b) be counted for quorum purposes in respect of the transaction, arrangement or contract. ...

Paragraph (3) does not apply to —

(a) an arrangement for giving a director any security or indemnity in respect of money lent by the director to or obligations undertaken by the director for the benefit of the company;

(b) an arrangement for the company to give any security to a third party in respect of a debt or obligation of the company for which the director has assumed responsibility wholly or in part under a guarantee or indemnity or by the deposit of a security; or

(c) an arrangement under which benefits are made available to employees and directors or former employees and directors of the company or any of its subsidiaries, ***which do not provide special benefits for directors or former directors***.