>Выражение встречается в следующем контексте:<
При сравнении денежных билетов с описанием и фотографическими изображениями соответствующих денежных билетов того же достоинства и года выпуска, приведёнными в специальной справочной литературе (каталог-справочник «Банкноты стран мира: денежное обращение 2008») установлено их совпадение по общим и частным признакам, характерным для денежных знаков соответствующего достоинства и выражающихся в наличии и взаиморасположении изображений на билетах; в точном соответствии текстового и цифрового содержания на лицевой и оборотной сторонах; в характерных для соответствующих билетов способе и качестве полиграфического воспроизведения; в наличии водяных знаков, защитных волокон и защитных нитей; в использовании регламентированных материалов.

When comparing the banknotes with the description and photographic images of the respective banknotes of the same denomination and the year of issue contained in specialized reference materials (reference book “Banknotes of the world: currency circulation 2008”)it has been detected that they coincide in terms of?? general and specific indicators typical for banknotes of the respective (or corresponding) denomination, выражающихся в i.e.?? availability and arrangement of images on banknotes; exact match of verbal and digital content on the front and reverse sides; method and quality of graphic reproduction typical for respective banknotes; availability of watermarks, security fiber and security threads; in use of the regulated material.

>Заранее спасибо

а кто там, простите, выражался?
в контекст это не попало (

It is important to clearly understand the concepts of identity, match, class and individual characteristics. Identity is a set of characteristics (combinations of class characteristics or combinations of class and individual characteristics) by which a thing is recognizable or known. Identity is the same as pattern. A pattern is established, for example, when a particular piece of class evidence like fiber (for which there are large quantities in the population) is put together with another piece of class evidence like red hair (which usually only exists in the subpopulation of white people).

Identity can also be used to conclusively eliminate people as suspects. Class characteristics alone do not allow matches with a single suspect. Matches for evidence with individual characteristics do allow pinpointing a particular suspect. Matches at the individual level are called similarities, because in theory, there's no such thing as a perfect match. An example of a similarity, or match in individual characteristics, would be a number of comparable points of comparison between the friction ridge lines on a latent (crime scene) fingerprint with the fingerprints of a particular suspect.

This kind of (true) match allows the examiner to say that, because the similarities outweigh any dissimilarities, the crime scene (unknown or questioned) sample "did come from the same source" as the suspect's (known or exemplar) sample, which is sufficient, most of time, for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Reliability and integrity are enhanced if the examiner has conducted tests on standards using controls. A standard is the opposite of exemplar.
http://www.forensic-medecine.info/criminalistics.html