 |
|
link 13.11.2012 20:06 |
|
Subject: White Smoke vs. Multiran, in terms of style gen. I used to work with the White Smoke program. However, many of my friends are talking me into trying Multiran.My question: which program is better in terms of correcting and perfecting the style of English? Thanks for your opinion. |
| why don't you try it and see for yourself. although i doubt MT would be of any use in "perfecting the style of English". it has a different purpose, MT that is. |
|
Multiran - virus, trojan http://www.hardwareforums.com/startup-list/multiran-exe-multiran.11489/ Please do not confuse it with MultiTran. Thank you for information about the White Smoke. Multitran is the English-Russian dictionary, not the grammar corrector. |
|
link 14.11.2012 8:00 |
|
I am sorry for the confusion. MultiTran, of course. I believe WS is aimed at correcting a text already drafted in English. Formally, it has all the functions MT does. I am not sure WS is good in tech translations, though. I used to write in English, and the writing is mostly about politics, socio-economic issues, history, stuff like that. I would love to hear from people having experience of using the White Smoke and MT. I assume both programs would be useful. But it is just an assumption. |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |