Предложение из заказной документации, пункт "Определение веса".

Ascertaining of the weight of the goods actually discharged by draft of barges of (видимо, or - п.п.) any other kinds of river or sea transport is not acceptable.

Мой вариант:
Проверка веса товара, фактически разгруженного ________ с баржи или любого другого морского или речного транспорта, не допускается.

Волнует by draft - нет идеи, о чем речь и как перевести.
Вопрос срочный.
Буду благодарна за любые комментарии (исправления, пояснения) по делу.

висит МТ, четвертый раз пытаюсь "спасибо" запостить)

Ааа..нет... у них заклинание есть в конце мелким шрифтом - таблицы отсутствуют :LOL

ОФФ: у нас на последнем судне в порту выгрузки выскочила недостача и прилично, на три с половиной тысячи - 60 тонн.
Присылают рассчет, подписанный всеми и капитаном в том числе.
Плотность воды на финальном драфте у них фигурирует 1,24, отсюда поправка идет рассчеты дальше.
Говорю, - ребята, мы в Эгейском море, че та у вас чересчур там солёно похоже, может 1,024? И тогда при всех прочих значениях, ваш клиент нам еще тонн за 400 должен денег американских.
Их ответ, а это греческий Инспекторат, меня убил
Приведу ответ полностью just to share experience.

We investigated the issue and our comments are as follows

During our initial D/S the Master declared constant weight 100 tons. This was also in line with the loading draft. So, our surveyor expected from the initial D/S a shortage of 84 tons - the Master had agreed - based on the declared constant of 100 tons and the light ship weight.

At final D/S we found shortage, 25 mt lower than the expected, the constants were close to the expected and the pilot was pressing to unmoor the vessel, so we had no indication that an error existed in the calculations.

Density was indeed 1.024 and the 1.24 was typing error. But in no way the discharged weight could be 4008 tons. Such a number (4008 tons) would pose the following problems:

* The on board quantity would be higher than the deadweight of the
ship ( 3778 tons), and
* With 4008 tons the constants would have been -316 tons

The difference with the B/L (shortage) is confirmed from the initial Draft Survey and not the final. In fact, the final D/S reduced the shortage.

It seems that there is another typing error in the final draft which cancels out the effect of density. Unfortunately, it remained unnoticed as all other facts were matching and there was a time pressure. That is why the ship signed the D/S without remarks.

We have to apologize for the typing error, which however do not seem to have caused a wrong result. The alleged weight of 4008 is completely unrealistic, first of all, because it surpasses ship's D/W, and because it gives unrealistic constants.

Therefore, and despite the typing error, we hold the opinion that the reported figure corresponds to the real discharged quantity. Even if the final D/S is disregarded the discharged quantity must be calculated from the initial D/S reduced by the light ship and the declared constants (confirmed in the loadport as well) which result in higher shortage.
= = = = = =

Вот так, а не так. :)

Та да, сейчас вообще все "мертво". И погода помогает к тому же.

Ну, ниче, как-то оно будет :)