 |
|
Subject: save the balance law RCC Article 180 would have saved the balance of the alleged agreement only if the Court were satisfied that the transaction would have been concluded without the invalid portion of the alleged agreement, which is denied.не совсем понятен смысл этого выражения. буду благодарен за помощь |
|
Ok, so this is how I see this sentence. If the transaction had been concluded without the invalid portion of the alleged agreement, then the law/regulation/etc found in Article 180 would have allowed the rest of the alleged agreement to be valid (and the relevant parts of the transaction would have been carried out validly). Would be nice to see the contents of Art 180 to help with context. The balance = the rest of the alleged agreement. |
| thx |
|
прочие положения договора остались бы в силе на основании статьи..., только если бы суд признал, что сделка была бы совершена и без включения недействительной ее части, однако в таком признании было отказано по поводу содержания ст. 180 - см. ГК РФ |
| You need to be logged in to post in the forum |