Столкнулись со сложностью точного перевода некоторых фраз

Streamline partnering with academia and National Labs
Collaborative R&D in value-chains
R&D to reduce/combine process steps
R&D in new equipment and to improve product yields
Stimulate market pull via end-users
Mentor start-ups for attracting investment
Retrain tech workforce in basic science/testing/quality

А это из раздела экологии

Regulatory and safety concerns

Streamline permit/product approvals at agencies
Increase government-sponsored R&D
Broader dissemination of findings
Balanced legislation and regulatory practices

Это из с таблицы, где указаны проблемы и пути решения развития рынка высоких технологий

Regulatory and safety concerns - В части нормативно-регулирующей базы и требований техники безопасности: (как подзаголовок)
Streamline permit/product approvals at agencies - упорядочение процедуры получения разрешений/оценки качества продукции в соответствующих органах
Broader dissemination of findings - Доведение до сведения/более широкое распространение результатов работы
Balanced legislation and regulatory practices - Рациональный порядок оформления/исполнения нормативных и регулирующих предписаний

К сожалению, не специалист в области менеджмента R&D...

Вот отрывок из выступпления

Private and institutional investments will increase faster when some of the fundamental technical issues of process scalability and cost for production of active high-tech components as well as risks related to high-tech manufacturing have been more compre-hensively addressed, and the economic returns and value propositions of hi-technology better quantified through collaborative R&D in targeted industry applications.

Может быть лучше "широкое оповещение"?

"Широкое оповещение" - как-то сразу рупор или микрофон представляется :-)

А Mentor start-ups for attracting investment ?

Specific tactical areas where government involvement in hi-technology can have high National impact while leveraging private investments include:

1. Incentives favoring longer-term investments (e.g. tax-free bonds for financing, tax credits for long-term capital investments, reduced capital gains tax rates, investment-specific loan guarantees, etc.)
2. Promoting strategic alliances for researchers (at academic and National Labs) and start-ups with larger players or end-users
3. Providing mentorship and business planning assistance to small businesses to identify key technology benefits (needed to attract private capital)
4. Underwriting and disseminating “good science” research and public education into the long-term issues related to waste disposal, safety and regulations
5. Undertaking tort and legal reform against frivolous lawsuits, which will provide developers greater immunity and protection once their products are Federally approved.

Mentor start-ups for attracting investments - Оказание поддержки новичкам (вновь созданным компаниям) в привлечении инвестиций

А "collaborative R&D" - это, скорее всего, научно-исследовательские разработки, финансируемые совместно государством и частным капиталом. То есть, можно так и написать "совместные научно-исследовательские разработки..." - из общего контекста будет понятно, о чем речь.

здесь присутсвует цепочка ценностей

Новые бизнес-модели в цепочке создания ценностей?

Это выражение связано с проблемами интеллектурной соственности

Nearly 52% of survey respondents who were manufacturers/integrators or suppliers of hi-technology products regarded these unresolved IP issues as a top-five barrier to commercialization. Analysis revealed these respondents are pursuing product applications for the equipment, tooling and logistics, electronics/semiconductors, computing, IT/telecommunications markets. For many small hi-technologycompanies, patent fees are already a major cost center and the fear of litigation on conflicting legal claims by multiple researchers patenting hi-technology, could significantly delay product introductions, affect revenue streams, as well as increase consumer costs, thereby raising the “activation energy” for market acceptance of new hi-technology products.
Triolo [14] has raised two critical issues with hi-technology patents that need to “play” out and be resolved in the courts through trial cases and court verdicts: (1) the assertion that smaller is not different; and (2) for infringement issues, the tendency of litigants to expand the scope of their traditional patent claims. Miller [15] and Voigt and Mickelson [16] have also identified other unique challenges with high-knowledge barrier, hi-technology-related inventions within the context of an infringement suit, which include: difficulty for judges and juries to understand hi-technology; the lack of prior art in hi-technology compared to other mature technologies; and the difficulty for attorneys in trying hi-technology cases, due to the lack of familiarity with hi-technology.
Thus, IP issues are a key factor inhibiting private investments and the more rapid commercialization of hi-technology products, since the path to revenue is not apparent to investors and VCs. The recent proliferation of patents on hi-technology innovations, many of which are regarded as broadly defined and interpreted by the patent awardees, is both, a source of economic opportunity and an impediment.
Aggressive technology transfer practices can be pursued through innovative relationships between academia and industry in hi-technologydevelopments. For example, NNI programs funded to university-based researchers could be made streamlined with greater transparency to attract and permit industrial partners to pursue their economic goals, while ensuring steady revenue streams for the institutions. This can take the form of granting companies non-exclusive or royalty-free, fully paid up, irrevocable, perpetual licenses to make, use or sell hi-technologyproducts under university-held patents. Universities could also contribute no-cost assistance to corporations implementing inventions in their facilities, thereby training new workers.