Не могу до конца разобраться, какая транслитерация корректная для ООО.

Вижу разные варианты:

1) https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=383354454
2) https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=182533008

Плюс с 2018 года увидел изменения в транслитерации буквы "щ".

Подскажите, пожалуйста, какой вариант верный.

всё же хочу разобраться, как правильно:

Obshestvo S Ogranichennoj Otvetstvennostyu или Obschestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennostyu?

А если следовать новым правилам транслитерации, вступившим в силу с 2018, то буква "щ" неверно написана в обоих случаях.

Уточните, пожалуйста, где вступили в сил такие правила.

А "Закон об обществах с ограниченной ответственностью", оказывается, надо было переводить "The Law on Obshestvos S Ogranichennoj Otvetstvennostyu (Obschestvos s ogranichennoy otvetstvennostyu)"?

Заметьте, что к слову "Obshestvo" я прибавил "s", т.к. это множественное число...

Ссылка на нововведения, неофициальный источник.

Устав я не вижу, вопрос, как корректно транслировать, в Bloomberg разные варианты.

Как верно написать английскими буквами Общество с ограниченной ответственностью?

Как бы Вы написали? Есть ли некие стандарты?

Вот, что у меня получилось после консультации с таблицей практической таблицей транскрипции за авторством Дмитрия Ермоловича.

http://philologician.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=218:prilozhenie-8-tablitsy-prakticheskoj-transkriptsii-s-anglijskogo-yazyka-na-russkij-i-s-russkogo-na-anglijskij&catid=110&Itemid=538

ObSHCHestvo s ogranichennOI otvetstvennostYU

Что скажете?

This question of how to transliterate Russian words into English is the subject of endless debate. In the UK at least, there's no "correct" way to transliterate Russian words into English. Unlike France (where the Académie française tries to 'standardise' the French language) and possibly Russia, there's no central body in the UK which gives advice on correct transliteration, so there are no definitive rules. The UK govt doesn't have a recommended system (to my knowledge); the Law Society may possibly have a system, but I doubt it. As a result there are several different systems in use. I'm not sure about the US, but I imagine they're much the same.

At grammar school [=secondary school] we were taught that:

е = e
ё = also e
ей = ej
й = j
ой = oj
х = kh
ц = ts
ч = ch
ш = sh
щ = shch
ъ = "
ы = y
ь = '
э = eh
ю = yu
я = ya

and that if they were written in capitals, Х, Ц etc should be written Kh, Ts, Ch, Sh, Shch, Eh, Yu, Ya. We were also told that Russian words were to be transliterated as they're written, not as they're spoken. So 'огромного' was to be written 'ogromnogo', not 'ogromnovo'. Under this system your example would be written: Obshchestvo s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost'yu. However, that's only one system out of several that are in use; there are many variations. For example,

е = e or ye or je
ё = e or yo or jo
ей = ej or ey
й = j or i or y
ой = oj or oy
х = kh or h
ц = ts or c
ч = ch or cz
ш = sh or sz
щ = shch or sch
ъ = " or (usually) completely ignored
ы = y
ь = ' or (usually) completely ignored
э = eh or e
ю = yu or ju
я = ya or ja

So, as you can see, there's no "correct" way of transliterating it; you have to be guided by how the organisation itself transliterates its name (as Syrira says), or else decide on your own, preferred system.

I wouldn't capitalise all of the words in 'Obschestvo S Ogran....' just because that's how English organisation names are written; it's a Russian title, so, personally, I would capitalise the first word only, as in the Russian.

Still, there is a question I have about «ой», which should be transliterated as “oi” according to Dmitry Yarmolovich, who is said to be an expert in transliteration.

http://philologician.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=218:prilozhenie-8-tablitsy-prakticheskoj-transkriptsii-s-anglijskogo-yazyka-na-russkij-i-s-russkogo-na-anglijskij&catid=110&Itemid=538

Please let me know whether you agree or not.

I can't speak for the СПР or the новые правила you referred to as I don't know anything about either, but from a UK/US point of view, which transliteration system you choose, is a decision for your customer (if he/she has a preference) or failing that, yourself.

Apparently the British Standards Institution (http://www.bsigroup.com) – Britain's (much smaller, and much less influential) 'cousin' of Russia's ГОСТ – once brought out a standard covering transliteration from Russian/Cyrillic into English, but that was 60 years ago! Also neither the CIOL or ITI sites even mention it.

I can't speak for the US but I suspect they're much the same as us and leave individual translators to choose which transliteration system they prefer to use. You could try the website of the American Translators' Association (http://www.atanet.org), though.

Thanks a lot, Johnstephenson!

BTW, how would you transliterate such last names as Сергеев, Андреев, Фадеев and the like?

Над ними по воздуху сокол катался
в скрипучей тележке с высокой дугой.
Фадеев смеялся, Калдеев чесался,
а Пепермалдеев лягался ногой.

Но вдруг неожиданно воздух надулся
и вылетел в небо горяч и горюч.
Фадеев подпрыгнул, Калдеев согнулся,
а Пепермалдеев схватился за ключ.

Но стоит ли трусить, подумайте сами,-
давай мудрецы танцевать на траве.
Фадеев с картонкой, Калдеев с часами,
а Пепермалдеев с кнутом в рукаве.

И долго, веселые игры затеяв,
пока не проснутся в лесу петухи,
Фадеев, Калдеев и Пепермалдеев
смеялись: ха-ха, хо-хо-хо, хи-хи-хи!

Хармс, конечно